Thursday, December 24, 2009
What does ERIC index??
"I am pleased to announce that ERIC has released a list of organizations that contribute grey literature, published reports and books to ERIC. This new source list coupled with the Journal List completes the documentation of ERIC’s coverage, and can be found in the “Our Collection” area of the Web site at www.eric.ed.gov/nonjournals. It includes links to the contributing organizations’ Web sites.
The list was created with the encouragement of the library community to highlight the depth and breadth of the ERIC Collection, particularly in the grey literature area. Among the hundreds of sources listed are professional associations, research foundations, federal and state agencies, policy organizations, university affiliates, and commercial publishers.
Jane Atwell
Sr. Communications Specialist
ERIC Project | www.eric.ed.gov"
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
WebCampus Toolkit for Library Resources
WebCampus Library Toolkit
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Just a reminder: Using Peer-Reviewed limiter in ERIC database
"... Currently ERIC applies the peer-reviewed designator to journals indexed from 2005 forward; some of these titles may also include the peer-reviewed status for issues published during the period 2002-2004. This data is included in the feed provided to commercial ERIC vendors [e.g., our ERIC access is through Ebsco] As a result, while limiting a search to peer-reviewed articles is helpful for locating peer-reviewed current materials, to find older records you must NOT use the limiter since those records were produced during a time when peer review was not part of the ERIC record.
ERIC obtains information about the peer-reviewed status of a publication from the publisher. When the information is not available from the publisher we use Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory. If you identify an error in an ERIC record, please contact ericfeedback@csc.com. We would be happy to investigate the issue...
Nancy Cawley
Communications Lead, ERIC Project"
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Deadline approaches for replacing 1st printing of APA 6th Ed.
· Download and print the eight pages of errata sheets, to use with the first printing
· Contact the APA for a free replacement copy (second printing). The APA FAQ sheet has all the information to request a replacement.
Please have the following information before you call the APA Service Center:
· Date of purchase
· Place purchased
· Amount paid
Monday, November 23, 2009
Oberlin's Open Access Resolution
For additional information on Open Access, see the information on Cory Tucker's Scholarly Communications guide.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
High graduation rates' impact on urban economies
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Common Core Data for Elementary/Secondary Schools, 2007-08
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
University presses move to Open Access model in tough budget times
"the press will survive -- in part by embracing a new model of organization (becoming part of the university library) and a new business model (embracing open access, in which most publications would be available online and free). While both of those changes are significant, key aspects of the press's identity and mission will not change. It will continue to be a peer-reviewed scholarly publisher, and plans to continue its highly regarded work in fields such as composition studies, folklore, poetry, environmental studies, and the history and culture of the West....But the more significant philosophical shift is to open access, with digital publication as the norm...the press will survive and that in digital format its books will have "the same rigorous scholarly peer review" as print books."
How to fix international higher education comparisons
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Replacing APA 6th Ed, first printing
"In order to receive a replacement manual you must return your current copy of the 6th edition to APA no later than December 15, 2009. We would like to make this transaction as cost neutral to you as possible, so efforts are being made to provide you with pre-paid postage you can use to return the book to us. We expect this process will be available the first week in November. If you are interested in a replacement copy please contact the APA Service Center at your convenience for further information. Service Center staff can be
reached at: 800 374-2721 from 8:30 AM- 6:30 PM (EST) M - F. Email
correspondence can be directed to order@apa.org.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
College teaching shifts to more "student-centered" approaches
The challenges faced by veterans returning to college
NCES study finds states lowered proficiency levels
Additional resources for understanding state proficiency standards, including profiles of proficiency standards for each state, frequently asked questions, and copies of past reports, are available at
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/statemapping.asp
Some excerpts from an article in today's Education Week~
"With 2014 approaching as the deadline by which states must get their all their students up to “proficient” levels on state tests, the U.S. Department of Education’s top statistics agency released data today suggesting that some states may have lowered student-proficiency standards on such tests in recent years.
For the 47-state study, researchers for the National Center for Education Statistics used student test scores to figure out where the proficiency levels on various state tests would lie on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Their results suggest that between 2005 and 2007, various states made their standards less rigorous in one or more grade levels or subjects in at least 26 instances. In 12 instances, particular states appeared to make their standards more stringent in one or more grade levels or subjects.
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, adopted nearly eight years ago, states are required to show that all students have attained proficient levels of performance in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-14 school year, and most states are far from reaching that goal.
“I think as 2014 looms, ... clearly what a lot of states are doing is changing the bar so that a lot more students will become proficient,” said Mark S. Schneider, who served as the NCES commissioner from 2005 to November 2008....
But the study uses a methodology that is controversial among some testing experts. They caution that the standardized exams that states use and the more rigorous NAEP—the congressionally mandated program known as “the nation’s report card”—are too different to put on the same scale....
The results, nonetheless, are expected to figure in growing efforts to develop common academic standards for what K-12 students should know and be able to do. So far, 48 states are taking part in a push to craft such standards, while federal education officials are at the same time making plans to award $350 million in grants to help states plan common assessments.Wednesday, October 28, 2009
APA finally does the right thing!
"I have just received word that After November 2, call APA at 1-800-374-2721, ext. 5510. Ask for instructions on how to go on-line and print a mailing label you can use to return your copy and receive a corrected copy."
An added note (3 pm, Oct. 28): I just saw on a listserv: "they (APA) said starting Nov. 2 they would have a form online and let us all fill it out. They would then send us a mailing label to return the copies. The only copies they would take would be copies purchased no desk copies or free copies. "Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Arne Duncan's speech at Teachers College
Monday, October 26, 2009
Undergraduate Students & Technology
"Since 2004, the annual ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology has sought to shed light on how information technology affects the college experience. We ask students about the technology they own and how they use it in and out of their academic world. We gather information about how skilled students believe they are with technologies; how they perceive technology is affecting their learning experience; and their preferences for IT in courses. The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2009 is a longitudinal extension of the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 studies. It is based on quantitative data from a spring 2009 survey of 30,616 freshmen and seniors at 103 four-year institutions and students at 12 two-year institutions; student focus groups that included input from 62 students at 4 institutions; and review of qualitative data from written responses to open-ended questions. In addition to studying student ownership, experience, behaviors, preferences, and skills with respect to information technologies, the 2009 study also includes a special focus on student ownership and use of Internet-capable handheld devices."
Thursday, October 22, 2009
NCES report on public elementary-secondary schools: 2007-2008
* There were 17,775 operating local education agencies in the 2007-08 school year, and among those agencies, 13,924 were regular school districts.
* Approximately 699,000 students enrolled in the 2,012 independent charter agencies, districts in which all schools were charter schools.
* Twenty-seven of the 13,924 active regular school districts enrolled 100,000 or more students.
To view the full report please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010306
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
If you want to buy the corrected APA 6th Ed...
"My purpose here is to gather and make generally available, information for anyone who would like to buy a second printing copy of the new sixth edition Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
My initial dismay at the situation of multiple pages of corrections to the newly released edition has turned to fascination with how the booksellers are responding to the issue. So I'm actively gathering information and hope to provide useful information that students and faculty as well as librarians can use.
Your comments are welcome, especially those that add new information, all comments will be moderated. I would prefer not to post hearsay, please include snips from emails with vendors, etc. to validate information whenever possible."
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
WWC evaluation of READ 180 program
"READ 180 is a reading program designed for students in elementary through high school whose reading achievement is below the proficient level. The goal of READ 180 is to address gaps in students’ skills through the use of a computer program, literature, and direct instruction in reading skills. The software component of the program aims to track and adapt to each student’s progress. In addition to the computer program, the READ 180 program includes workbooks designed to address reading comprehension skills, paperback books for independent reading, and audiobooks with corresponding CDs for modeled reading.
No studies of READ 180 meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards,2 but seven studies meet WWC evidence standards with reservations. The seven studies included 10,638 students, ranging from grade 4 to grade 9, who attended elementary, middle, and high schools in Arizona, California, Florida, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Virginia.3
Based on these seven studies, the WWC considers the extent of evidence for READ 180 to be medium to large for comprehension and general literacy achievement. No studies that meet WWC evidence standards with or without reservations examined the effectiveness of READ 180 in the alphabetics or reading fluency domains."
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
APA is taking a lot of flak...
2009 NAEP Math report card is out
Significant results for mathematics in 2009 include:
* For the first time since the assessment began, 4th graders showed no overall increase at the national level, although they scored significantly higher in 2009 than when the assessment began in 1990. For 8th graders, scores in 2009 were higher when compared to both 2007 and 1990. These nationwide patterns also held for most student subgroups. Findings regarding students performing at or above the NAEP achievement levels mirror those of the scale scores at both grades.
* Compared to 2007, five states and jurisdictions made gains at both grades 4 and 8, three states increased at grade 4 only, and ten increased at grade 8 only. Scores declined in four states at grade 4, while no state declined at grade 8.
CHE report on institutions awarding minority doctorates
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
New report from NCES on HS graduation and dropout rates
includes national and regional population estimates for the percentage of students who dropped out of high school between 2006 and 2007, the percentage of young people who were dropouts in 2007, and the percentage of young people who were not in high school and had some form of high school credential in 2007.
Annual data from 1972-2007 reveals trends by race, gender, income and other characteristics. State, regional and national level data is provided.
To view the full report please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009064
Practice guide on "Using Student Achievement Data to Support Instructional Decision Making"
This practice guide offers five recommendations for creating the organizational and technological conditions that foster effective data use, including: 1) make data part of an ongoing cycle of instructional improvement; 2) teach students to examine their own data and set learning goals; 3) establish a clear vision for school wide data use; 4) provide supports that foster a data-driven culture within the school; and 5) develop and maintain a district wide data system. Each recommendation describes action steps for implementation, as well as suggestions for tackling obstacles that may impede progress. The practice guide was released by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance at the Institute for Education Sciences.
To view the practice guide, please visit:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/#dddm_pg
Reading strategies for 4th grade: an international perspective
To view the full report please visit: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009013
New report on post-secondary education
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Corrections to APA 6th Ed. Manual
A separate link to the corrected Sample Papers is here. A new 2nd printing has been issued.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Using the "peer reviewed" limiter in ERIC searches
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Just to clarify why this is happening, at this time ERIC applies the peer-reviewed designator to journals indexed from 2005 forward (note that some of these titles may also include the peer-reviewed status for the period 2002-2004). Limiting a search to peer-reviewed articles is helpful for locating peer-reviewed current materials, but to find older records we recommend not using the limiter.
ERIC obtains information about the peer-reviewed status of a publication from the publisher. When the information is not available from the publisher we use Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory."
Best regards,
Nancy Cawley
Communications Lead, ERIC Project
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ulrich's is available in our A-Z list of databases BTW
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
A Big Kerfuffle over Student Choice in Reading
Projections of Education Statistics to 2018
"It includes statistics on enrollment, graduates, teachers, and expenditures in elementary and secondary schools, and enrollment and earned degrees conferred expenditures of degree-granting institutions. For the Nation, the tables, figures, and text contain data on enrollment, teachers, graduates, and expenditures for the past 14 years and projections to the year 2018. For the 50 States and the District of Columbia, the tables, figures, and text contain data on projections of public elementary and secondary enrollment and public high school graduates to the year 2018."
Monday, September 14, 2009
The end of the university as we know it??
An excerpt:
"Like Craigslist, StraighterLine threatens the most profitable piece of a conglomerate business: freshman lectures, higher education’s equivalent of the classified section. If enough students defect to companies like StraighterLine, the higher education industry faces the unbundling of the business model on which the current system is built. The consequences will be profound....Regional public universities and non-elite private colleges are most at risk from the likes of StraighterLine. They could go the way of the local newspaper, fatally shackled to geography, conglomeration, and an expensive labor structure, too dependent on revenues that vanish and never return."
The company's founder has been frustrated by the push back from students and faculty at institutions with which he has tried to partner (in order to get accreditation cover for courses students complete online). "But neither the regulatory nor the psychological obstacles match the evolving new reality... The accreditation wall will crumble, as most artificial barriers do. All it takes is for one generation of college students to see online courses as no more or less legitimate than any other—and a whole lot cheaper in the bargain—for the consensus of consumer taste to rapidly change. The odds of this happening quickly are greatly enhanced by the endless spiral of steep annual tuition hikes, which are forcing more students to go deep into debt to pay for college while driving low-income students out altogether. If Burck Smith doesn’t bring extremely cheap college courses to the masses, somebody else will."
How children learn about race
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Education doctoral programs and others not assessed by NRC
Excluded fields appear to have granted more than a quarter of all research doctorates from 2001 to 2005 to U.S. citizens and permanent residents—27 percent, according to our calculations, based on data from the Survey of Earned Doctorates, conducted for the National Science Foundation and other government agencies. But African-American, American Indian, and Mexican-American people, as well as women, are disproportionately likelier to have received Ph.D.'s in fields that are not included in the NRC's assessment, relative to white men and Asian-American people. For example, 54 percent of African-American women, 49 percent of American Indian women, 43 percent of Mexican-American women, 42 percent of African-American men, and 34 percent of women in general were awarded doctorates in fields not currently assessed by the NRC.
What accounts, then, for this seemingly odd pattern of doctorates awarded to people in various demographic groups by fields included and excluded in the current NRC assessment? The exempted fields—including education, business, social work, psychological counseling, library science, home economics, and subfields of the health and agricultural sciences—share a professional and applied orientation as opposed to a basic research one. Many also emphasize public scholarship, a tradition that favors the interweaving of intellectual pursuit with social improvement.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Interventions to Reduce Stereotype Threat in the Classroom
NCSER Report on HS Exprience of Students with Mental Retardation
REL West has new report on state implementation of RTI
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Great new K-12 teaching resources!
The UNLV University Libraries are pleased to announce the launch of a new digital collection with features designed for K-12 educators:
Southern Nevada: The Boomtown Years, 1900-1925
http://digital.library.unlv.edu/boomtown/
Southern Nevada: the Boomtown Years 1900-1925 is an online collection of over 1,600 primary source documents and over 30 standards-based activities that can be used in K-12 classrooms. The collection brings together digitized materials from the UNLV Libraries Special Collections, the Nevada State Museum and Historical Society in Las Vegas, and the Clark County Museum to document the history and development of Southern Nevada from 1900 to 1925. Photographs, selected newspapers, maps, mining reports and surveys, stock certificates, correspondence, and more give a detailed account of life in the Boomtown years of Southern Nevada and provide a unique opportunity to show students what life was like through the eyes of those who lived it. Teaching activities are available for all grade levels and eleven subject areas and are meant to engage students in higher-level thinking while directly interacting with the primary sources housed in this collection.
The Libraries welcome your feedback on this collection! You are invited to view the collection and respond to a quick survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Y5rxIAt9_2fMhIGT_2fipw9GvQ_3d_3d. Comments, questions, and feedback are always welcome. Bookmarks, flyers, and in-class demonstrations are available by contacting the Libraries. Please forward to other interested parties.
Stories for Change
and the home page describes their mission as an "online meeting place for community digital storytelling facilitators and advocates. Learn more about how we're using this unique medium for social change..." Some of the categories for their stories include Education, Family, Identity, Youth, and Immigration.
Monday, August 24, 2009
A Wealth of Data: The new Higher Ed Almanac is out
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
U.S. Performance Across International Assessments of Student Achievement
The executive summary with major findings as well as links to the full text of the report is available here: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/analysis/
Monday, August 10, 2009
Writing assignments can improve minority school achievement
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Web resources on Response to Intervention
One of the articles led me to these two additional sites described briefly by Douglas Fuchs, professor and Nicholas Hobbs Chair in Special Education and Human Development at Vanderbilt University:
"First, there is a newly established National Center on RTI funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education's Office of Special Education Programs. Its email is: rticenter@air.org. The Web site has important pages and links that will lead you to what you're looking for. Second, there is the RTI Action Network. I highly recommend these sites."
The National Association of State Directors of Special Education also have information on RTI here.
Webinar on 2nd wave of education stimulus funding
Stimulus: The Second Wave | ||
This event is scheduled for Thursday, Aug. 20, 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern time. The U.S. Department of Education is gearing up to award $5 billion from the federal economic-stimulus package to school districts, states, and education nonprofit organizations through several competitive grant programs. What are the requirements for Race to the Top, innovation, and other grant programs? How can leaders best compete for those awards? And how can the money be used to drive education reform? Join our guests, two high-level officials from the education department and a state education commissioner, as they discuss the details of the grant competitions and the education reform challenges ahead for K-12 leaders.
Presenters: See registration info here |
NCSER issues new reports on alternate assessments
The state level reports are available here:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20093013.asp
The National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA)was mandated by Section 664(c) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) to examine alternate assessment systems in 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Black-White achievement gaps persist
Research Funding Webinars from IES
Follow the money
For current news as well as a collection of articles and opinions (blog posts), see EdWeek's "Schools and the Stimulus" page:
http://www.edweek.org/ew/collections/schools-stimulus/index.html
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
More Universities make their Research Available Online
The Irrationality of Current Publication Models, or Why Open Access is Better.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Draft legislation to emphasize adolescent literacy
- increase funding for literacy education overall
- increase the proportion spent on older students
- designate monies for staff development
- emphasize the connections between reading and writing
NCATE to change accreditation requirements
Education Week's article on the significantly revised standards discusses two possible paths to meeting requiements.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Time to Kill "No Child Left Behind"
An excerpt is here:
"Congress should get rid of No Child Left Behind because it is a failed law. It is dumbing down our children by focusing solely on reading and mathematics. By ignoring everything but basic skills, it is not preparing students to compete with their peers in the high-performing nations of Asia and Europe, nor is it preparing them for citizenship in our complex society. It has usurped state and local control of education. Washington has neither the knowledge nor the capacity to micromanage the nation’s schools."
The full article in EdWeek is here.
Longitudinal data on late high school dropouts from NCES
"....presents information about selected characteristics and experiences of high school sophomores in 2002 who subsequently dropped out of school. It also presents comparative data about late high school dropouts in the years 1982, 1992, and 2004. The findings only address dropping out in late high school and do not cover students who dropped out before the spring of 10th grade. For this reason, the reported rates are lower than those based on the students' entire high school or earlier school career. Key findings include the following:
* Forty-eight percent of all late high school dropouts come from families in the lowest quarter (bottom 25 percent) of the socioeconomic status distribution, and 77 percent of late high school dropouts come from the lowest half of the socioeconomic status distribution.
* Most late high school dropouts (83 percent) listed a school-related (versus a family- or employment-related) reason for leaving. These reasons included missing too many school days, thinking it would be easier to get a GED, getting poor grades, and not liking school.
* The overall late high school dropout rate was lower in 2004 than in 1982 (7 percent versus 11 percent, respectively) and lower in 1992 than in 1982 (6 percent versus 11 percent), but it showed no statistically significant difference in 2004 compared with 1992."
To view, download and print the report as a PDF file, please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009307
Why the discrepancies in funding higher ed institutions?
Monday, June 8, 2009
University presses endorse open access
Complaints about group projects in class
"a tenure system that allows flexibility in firing is oxymoronic."
The impact of work on college students--it's complicated
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
How to talk to an administrator
Monday, May 11, 2009
NAEP at a glance
The results presented in "At a Glance" examine the change over time in average scores for all students, in addition to the changes in the gender and racial/ethnic achievement gaps observed in the 2007 assessments. The brochure pairs these results with instructive graphics to help you understand the findings. "At a Glance" also notes how many students at each grade level participated in the assessments and breaks down percentages of certain demographic details of participants, including race/ethnicity, school type, and percentage of accommodated students. Find the "At a Glance" publication at
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009486
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Interactive data charts available from Google
Here are some sample graphs:
Google's blog entry is here:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/adding-search-power-to-public-data.html
Thanks to librarian Michael Yunkin for bringing this to my attention! I'll add this to the "Statistics and Demographics" tab of the Education subject guide, too.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
NCES issues new report on adult literacy
The 2003 NAAL assessed the English literacy skills of a nationally representative sample of 18,500 U.S. adults (age 16 and older) residing in private households. NAAL is the first national assessment of adult literacy since the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS). The NAAL project comprised four assessment components: the core literacy tasks, the main literacy assessment, the Fluency Addition to NAAL (FAN), and the Adult Literacy Supplemental Assessment (ALSA). Results from the main literacy assessment are reported as averages and as the percentage of adults in each of four literacy levels: Below Basic, Basic, Intermediate, and Proficient. This report focuses on results from the FAN and the ALSA.
The Adult Literacy Supplemental Assessment (ALSA) was administered to adults unable to successfully answer the core literacy tasks. Instead of completing the main literacy assessment, these adults completed the ALSA, which gathered information about their letter-reading, word-reading, word-identification, and basic comprehension skills.
The Fluency Addition to NAAL (FAN) measures the basic reading skills of America's adults. The FAN was administered to all adults who participated in the NAAL project following the completion of the main literacy assessment or the supplemental assessment.
Key Findings:
* Seven million adults, or about 3% of the adult population, could not complete even the most basic literacy tasks in the main assessment and were given the supplemental assessment.
* Nearly 1 in 5 adults in the nonliterate in English group had a high school diploma or GED. Among them, more than half (representing roughly 600,000 adults) had earned their high school degree in the US.
* For those for whom Spanish is a first language, a delay in learning English is associated with low basic reading skills. Those who learned English before age 11 had basic reading scores similar to average native English speakers (97 words read correctly per minute); however, for those who learned English after age 21, average scores were 35 points (or about one-third) lower. Due to the correlational nature of these data, it is impossible to make causal attributions, i.e., to say that a delay in learning English causes low basic reading skills.
* Adults who took the main literary assessment were able to read, on average, 98 words correctly per minute (wpm), in comparison to 34 wpm by those in the supplemental assessment.
To view, download and print the report as a PDF file, please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009481
Monday, May 4, 2009
Study of reading intervention programs find no benefits
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Recess improves 3rd graders classroom behavior--maybe
Barros, R. M., Silver, E. J., & Stein, R. E. K. (2009). School recess and group classroom behavior. Pediatrics, 123(2): 431–436.
(online access to this article is available through the UNLV Libraries)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Research Funding Webinars scheduled
Information about the specific trainings are offered here: http://ies.ed.gov/funding/webinars/
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Grants available to bring book authors to schools
If the adjuncts are treated well....
Lots of discussion about student financial aid
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
University lectures on YouTube
Guide on using RTI for students struggling with math
The guide is linked from this page:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/#rti_math_pg
Arne Duncan offers tips on applying for funds
Monday, April 20, 2009
Awesome Stories: Media resources for educators
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
New data on post-secondary students
NPSAS:08 data are a rich source of information on student demographics, family background, education and work experiences, and student financial aid, including federal, state, institutional, and other sources. The NPSAS:08 study contains a sample of 128,000 students which represent 21 million undergraduates and 3 million graduate students enrolled in postsecondary education anytime between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008.
Selected NPSAS:08 Findings.
* Nearly two-thirds (66 percent) of all undergraduates received some type of financial aid. For those receiving any aid, the total average amount was $9,100.
* About one-half (52 percent) of all undergraduates received grant aid, and more than one-third (38 percent) obtained student loans. The average grant amount was $4,900, and the average loan amount was $7,100.
* Nearly one-half (47 percent) of all undergraduates received some type of federal student aid. About one-fourth (28 percent) received an average of $2,800 in federal Pell grants, and about one-third (35 percent) obtained an average of $5,100 in federal student loans.
* Among undergraduates financially dependent on their parents, 28 percent came from families with incomes under $40,000 and another 28 percent from families with incomes of $100,000 or more.
* Three-fourths (74 percent) of all graduate students received some type of financial aid, with an average amount of $17,600. Forty-three percent took out an average of $18,500 in student loans, and about one-fifth (22 percent) received tuition aid from their employers.
To view, download and print the report as a PDF file, please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009166
To Use the Data Analysis System (DAS) online, please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/dasol/
Monday, April 13, 2009
Student research assignments--what do we want them to learn
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Free training available in using National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2) database
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Some positive results for the REDI program
This study examined whether the Head Start Research-based Developmentally Informed (REDI) program is more effective than the standard Head Start program at improving the language, emergent literacy, and social-emotional skills of preschoolers.
The study finds that students in the REDI group outperformed control students on one of three measures of language development (effect sizes ranged from –0.07 to 0.15) and two of three measures of emergent literacy skills (effect sizes ranged from 0.16 to 0.39).
In addition, REDI program students exhibited greater understanding of emotions, better social problem-solving skills, and higher levels of learning engagement than students in regular Head Start classrooms.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
New NCES/IES Report: Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-8 Countries: 2009
Download the report from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009039
Monday, March 16, 2009
Fiscal year 2007 data on revenues/expenditures for public elementary & secondary schools
"The Common Core of Data (CCD) is an annual collection of public elementary and secondary education data by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in the Institute of Education Sciences. The data are reported by state education agencies (SEAs). The finance data are reported to the U.S. Census Bureau, which acts as the data collection agent for NCES. Student membership data are reported to the U.S. Department of Education’s EDFacts data collection system. This report presents findings on public education revenues and expenditures using fiscal year 2007 (FY 07) data from the National Public Education Financial Survey (NPEFS) of the CCD survey system. Programs covered in the NPEFS include regular, special, and vocational education; charter schools (if they reported data to the SEA); and state-run education programs (such as special education centers or education programs for incarcerated youth).
The CCD NPEFS is a universe collection of public elementary and secondary education finance data reported annually by SEAs in each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the four other jurisdictions of American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The NPEFS provides SEA-level data for all revenues and expenditures associated with each reporting state or jurisdiction, including revenues by source and expenditures by function and object." (from the Introduction at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/expenditures/)
Links to all Table data (also available in Excel format) are here: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/expenditures/tables.asp
Link to the full report is here: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009337
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
New reports out from IPEDS on higher ed enrollment, graduation rates and financial aid
In fall 2007, Title IV institutions in the United States enrolled a total of 18.7 million graduate and undergraduate students; 62 percent were enrolled in 4-year institutions, 36 percent were enrolled in 2-year institutions, and 2 percent were enrolled in less-than-2-year institutions.
Approximately 57 percent of full-time, first-time bachelor's or equivalent degree-seekers attending 4-year institutions completed a bachelor's or equivalent degree at the institution where they began their studies within 6 years.
During 2006-07 academic year, 73 percent of the 2.8 million full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates attending Title IV institutions located in the United States received financial aid.
To view, download and print the report as a PDF file, please visit:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009155
WWC assessment of "I Can Learn Pre-Algebra and Algebra" programs
"One study of I CAN Learn®Pre-Algebra and Algebra meets What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards and four studies meet WWC evidence standards with reservations. The five studies included 16,519 eighth-grade students from middle schools in California, Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana.3
Based on these five studies, the WWC considers the extent of evidence for I CAN Learn®Pre-Algebra and Algebra to be medium to large for math achievement."
Links to the full evaluation report are here:
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
How Professors Think -- inside the peer review process
Inside Higher Ed (March 4) had a lengthy review of a new book by Michèle Lamont, called How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. She sat in on considerations of grant and fellowship applications for such organizations as the American Council of Learned Societies, the Social Science Research Council, and the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
Some (hopefully) tantalizing excerpts from the interview/review:
- "The peer review processes she studied involved grants to professors and graduate students, and all the panels involved professors from many disciplines. She writes that, as a result, the findings may suggest similar issues for multi-disciplinary committees on individual campuses -- panels that frequently play a key role in tenure reviews once a candidate has been considered at the departmental level. "
- "One of the key findings was that professors in different disciplines take very different approaches to decision making. The gap between humanities and social sciences scholars is as large as anything C.P. Snow saw between the humanities and the hard sciences."
- "The most common flaw she documents is a pattern of professors applying very personal interests to evaluating the work before them. “People define what is exciting as what speaks to their own personal interest, and their own research,” she said. "
I'll put the book on order...
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Advancing Excellent Teaching in American Schools -- free videos
Annenberg Media's multimedia resources help teachers increase their expertise in their fields and assist them in improving their teaching methods. Many programs are also intended for students in the classroom and viewers at home. All Annenberg Media videos exemplify excellent teaching.
Annenberg Media resources can be accessed for FREE at Learner.org, or can be purchased through the Web site or by calling 1-800-LEARNER."
My professional listserv also offered this information: "We've discovered that these are best viewed in Internet Explorer. Closed Captions are available. One-time individual registration (free) is required. " Hope you find this useful...let me know!
Pre-elementary Special Education study released
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Research compares 1st grade math curricula
To view, download and print the report as a PDF file, please visit:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094052/index.asp
Monday, February 16, 2009
Measuring Up 2008: National and State report cards on higher education
The importance of middle school for college readiness
- Only 20% of tested high school grads were ready for entry-level college courses in the four areas of biology, social science, English composition and college algebra
- 25% of tested students were not prepared for entry-level college courses in any of the four subject areas.
- Less than 20% of tested eighth graders were on target to be college-ready by the time they graduate.
Expanded Learning Time for ELL's
Thursday, February 5, 2009
"Content first" teaching improves understanding of science concepts
"...a review of the article "Teaching Science as a Language: A Content-First Approach to Science Teaching". This study examined whether teaching scientific concepts using everyday language before introducing scientific terminology improves the understanding of these concepts."
U.S. Students improve in math but not science on the TIMMS
TIMSS has been administered four times: in 1995, 1999, 2003, and 2007. The United States participated in all four administrations. In 2007, 36 countries participated at grade four, while 48 participated at grade eight.
Mathematics
Results show that the 2007 average mathematics scores of both U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students were higher than the TIMSS scale average. At grade four, the average U.S. mathematics score was higher than those in 23 of the 35 other countries, lower than those in 8 countries (all 8 were in Asia or Europe), and not measurably different from those in 4 countries. At grade eight, the average U.S. mathematics score was higher than those in 37 of the 47 other countries, lower than those in 5 countries (all located in Asia), and not measurably different from those in 5 countries.
Comparing average scores from the first administration of TIMSS in 1995 to the most recent results from 2007 showed that both U.S. fourth- and eighth-graders improved in mathematics.
Science
In science, the average scores of both U.S. fourth- and eighth-graders were higher than the TIMSS scale average. At grade four, the average U.S. science score was higher than those in 25 of the 35 other countries, lower than those in 4 countries (all of them in Asia), and not measurably different from those in 6 countries. At eighth grade, the average U.S. science score was higher than the average scores in 35 of the 47 other countries, lower than those in 9 countries (all located in Asia or Europe), and not measurably different from those in 3 countries.
Unlike in mathematics, the average science scores for both U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students were not measurably different in 2007 compared to the first TIMSS results collected in 1995.
Models of Information Inquiry
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Peer discussion increases comprehension
"When students answer an in-class conceptual question individually using clickers, discuss it with their neighbors, and then revote on the same question, the percentage of correct answers typically increases. This outcome could result from gains in understanding during discussion, or simply from peer influence of knowledgeable students on their neighbors. To distinguish between these alternatives in an undergraduate genetics course, we followed the above exercise with a second, similar (isomorphic) question on the same concept that students answered individually. Our results indicate that peer discussion enhances understanding, even when none of the students in a discussion group originally knows the correct answer."
(M.K.Smith, W.B. Wood, W.K. Adams, C. Wieman, J.K. Knight, N. Guild, T.T. Su. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 2 January 2009:Vol. 323. no. 5910, pp. 122 - 124)
If you have trouble with the link, you can go through the Journals tab on the Libraries homepage to get to our electronic subscription to Science.
The Trouble with Impact Factors
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Who gets advanced degrees?
Thursday, January 22, 2009
2009 Horizon Report is out -- emerging technologies and education
"The annual Horizon Report describes the continuing work of the NMC’s Horizon Project, a research-oriented effort that seeks to identify and describe emerging technologies likely to have considerable impact on teaching, learning, and creative expression within higher education. A collaboration between the NMC and ELI, the 2009 Horizon Report is the sixth in the annual series.
Each year, the Horizon Report describes six areas of emerging technology that will have significant impact on higher education within three adoption horizons over the next one to five years." (from the Website)
Demographic trends continue
Open Access publishing gets a boost from Springer
"In the latest move of for-profit publishing into open access, Springer on Wednesday announced a deal with the University of California under which the university’s researchers who publish with Springer will be able to have completely open access versions of their article appear without separate charges or delays." (from Inside Higher Ed: Quick Takes, Jan. 22, 2009)
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Training Institute on Cluster-Randomized Trials
All applications must be received no later than Friday, March 20, 2009 at 8:00 p.m. EST.
For more information about the Training Institute, including the application procedures, please visit:
http://ies.ed.gov/whatsnew/conferences/?id=394&cid=5
If you need assistance, please contact Dr. Christina Chhin, at (202) 219-2280 or christina.chhin@ed.gov
Thursday, January 8, 2009
AACU issues "new" report on assessing student learning in higher ed
An excerpt from the Jan. 8 Inside Higher Education article about the AACU report:
"AACU, in contrast, believes that colleges must “actually use assessment to improve student learning,” and its re-released report, updated and reinforced in several ways, is meant to be a roadmap to help both the higher education establishment and individual colleges figure out how to do that. By arguing both for the idea that colleges must measure student learning and strongly against the use of “mass testing,” which it argues would be an “enormous misuse of time and scarce resources,” the AACU statement seeks to walk a middle path in the contentious debate over whether and how colleges should measure and report student learning."
New adult literacy data available
To produce this study, NCES gathered data from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL), a nationally representative sample of more than 19,000 Americans age 16 and older, and the 2000 Census, which provided "predictor variables" such as education and income.
NAAL data were correlated with the predictor variables to see if there was a pattern among them. From this information, a model was established. Using the model, estimates were predicted for areas where there were not sufficient assessment data. The same approach was also applied to the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), so changes from 1992 to 2003 can be examined.
The report is accompanied by an interactive web tool, which shows the percentage of adults lacking Basic Prose Literacy Skills for all states and counties. In addition to allowing users to view adult literacy percentages for any given state, the web tool also allows for comparisons to be made between two states, two counties in the same state, two counties in different states, across years for a state, and across years for a county.